Gas chromatography, otherwise known as Gas-liquid chromatography, is for separating, identifying, and quantifying the components in organic compound mixtures. This technique works by selectively partitioning the organic compounds’ components between mobile and stationary phases inside a column. Do you know the differences between HPLC and GC? Gas chromatography is suitable for separating compounds with high volatility, low molecular weights, and thermal stability.
3 types of gases employed in GC are carrier gas, fuel gas and zero air. There are different components involved in GC chromatography, namely, mobile phase, sample injector, column, column oven, detector and data system. The main types of GC are Gas-Liquid Chromatography or GLC and Gas-Solid Chromatography or GSC. Either liquid or solid can be used as the stationary phase in these methods, where gas is the mobile phase.
HPLC and GC techniques
GLC is the technique used to separate the molecules or ions dissolved in a solvent. In GSC, retention happens because of physical absorption.
It works on the principle that when contact occurs between the sample solution and a liquid or solid phase, the solutes present in these components will start to interact with other phases present there.
Then separation of different components may happen due to the ion-exchanges, different absorption rates, varied sizes, change in interaction pattern, etc. After passing through the column at different rates, the components in the compound will be separated.
Gas chromatography is an analytical instrument that helps in saving time. It is user-friendly, which requires minimum operations.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography is like GC in many ways. They work on the same principles. But, there are specific differences between these two techniques. The primary difference is that HPLC uses liquid as the carrier while GC uses gas.
Unlike GC, HPLC is the analytical technique used for testing thermally labile compounds with higher molecular weights. The separation happens in HPLC, with molecules’ distribution between the mobile liquid phase and the stationary solid phase inside a column.
A clear understanding of the difference in characteristics of these two composer separation methods will help choose the proper technique for separation.
Key Differences between HPLC and GC
1. The mobile phase in HPLC is liquid, and it is a gas in GC. There will be a pump in HPLC to drive the liquid through the column. There will be high viscosity and density of liquids in this method.
2. The nature of analytes is another factor that is different in both methods. The samples used in the HPLC method are thermally labile, and they will degrade at high temperatures. In GC, the samples can resist and withstand high temperatures, even up to 400-degree Celsius. The volatile nature of solutes, the capacity to handle liquids, dissolved solids, and even gases make GC different from HPLC. Samples for HPLC are always liquids, either normal ones or solutions with dissolved solids. The samples with high molecular weights are used in HPLC while those with lower molecular weights are used in GC.
3. Column size is generally short and broad in HPLC due to the higher density and viscosity of liquids. It ranges from 10 cm to 25 cm with about 0.46 mm id. Longer columns are used in GC, with narrow bores. It is because the gases are less dense and with low levels of viscosity. The length of the capillary columns can be several meters.
Operating Techniques
4. Operating temperatures for both techniques are different. Due to the thermally labile nature, HPLC experiments are always conducted at ambient temperatures. It may extend from 40 degrees Celsius to 60 degrees. On the other hand, GC operations can be conducted up to 400-degree Celsius, as the samples are irresistible to high temperatures.
5. Operating pressures are also different in these two analytical methods. Liquids require high pressures of about 5000-6000 psi for analytical separations because of the higher levels of density and viscosity. HPLC operations can even afford a range of 15,000 to 18,000 psi. Only lower pressures are required in GC, that range from 150 to 200 psi.
6. The standard detectors used in HPLC are UV detector, photodiode array detector, Fluorescence detector, Refractive index detector, and Conductivity detector. Detectors used in GC are Flame ionization detector, Thermal conductivity detector, Electron capture detector, Nitrogen phosphorus detector, Flame photometric detector, and Photoionization detector.
The use of mass selective detectors in both GC and HPLC helps in achieving outstanding results. Though similar in many ways, the differences in both the GC and HPLC features make them unique in their way, and the awareness about these differences will enable the user to select the correct analytical method to fulfill their purpose.
Gas Chromatography (GC)
Gas chromatography is a technique used to separate volatile and thermally stable compounds. The sample is vaporized and carried by an inert gas (the mobile phase) through a column coated with a stationary phase. The separation occurs based on the differing affinities of the components for the stationary phase.
Key Components of GC
1. Injection Port: The sample is introduced into the system, where it is vaporized before entering the column.
2. Column: Packed or capillary columns contain the stationary phase, where separation occurs.
3. Detector: Common detectors include flame ionization detectors (FID), thermal conductivity detectors (TCD), and mass spectrometers (MS).
Applications of GC
Environmental Analysis: Detection of pollutants in air and water.
Forensics: Drug and toxicology testing.
Petrochemical Industry: Analysis of hydrocarbons.
Food and Beverage: Quality control and flavor profiling.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
HPLC is used for separating non-volatile or thermally unstable compounds. Unlike GC, HPLC uses a liquid mobile phase, allowing for the analysis of a broader range of substances. The technique is highly sensitive and can separate complex mixtures with high precision.
Applications of HPLC
Pharmaceuticals: Drug purity testing and formulation analysis. – Biochemistry: Protein and peptide separation.
Clinical Diagnostics: Detection of biomarkers in blood and urine. – Food Safety: Pesticide and contaminant analysis.
Advancements in Chromatography
Recent developments in GC and HPLC include:
1. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
GC-MS combines the separation power of gas chromatography with the detection sensitivity of mass spectrometry, making it a gold standard for volatile and semi-volatile compound analysis. Recent improvements in GC-MS have focused on increasing resolution, reducing analysis time, and enhancing detection limits.
One key advancement is the development of fast GC-MS, which employs shorter columns and higher carrier gas velocities to achieve rapid separations without sacrificing resolution. This is particularly valuable in high-throughput laboratories, such as those in clinical or environmental monitoring, where speed is critical.
Another breakthrough is the integration of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with GC systems. GC-MS/MS provides superior selectivity by isolating and fragmenting target ions, reducing background interference and improving detection in complex matrices. This is especially useful in trace analysis, such as detecting pesticide residues in food or identifying biomarkers in metabolomics studies.
Additionally, advancements in ionization techniques, such as cold electron ionization (cold EI), have expanded the range of compounds amenable to GC-MS analysis. Cold EI minimizes thermal degradation, enabling the analysis of thermally labile molecules that were previously challenging to study.
2. Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC)
UHPLC represents a significant leap over traditional High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), offering faster separations, higher resolution, and improved sensitivity. By utilizing sub-2-micron particles and pressures exceeding 15,000 psi, UHPLC achieves superior efficiency compared to conventional HPLC.
One of the most impactful developments in UHPLC is the introduction of superficially porous particles (SPPs), also known as core-shell particles. These particles reduce diffusion distances, enhancing mass transfer and allowing for faster flow rates without compromising peak shape. As a result, laboratories can achieve high-resolution separations in minutes rather than hours.
Another innovation is the integration of UHPLC with advanced detection systems, such as high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) or diode-array detection (DAD). Coupling UHPLC with HRMS enables precise molecular weight determination and structural elucidation, making it invaluable in proteomics and metabolomics. Meanwhile, UHPLC-DAD systems provide comprehensive spectral data, facilitating the identification of unknown compounds in complex samples.
Automation and software improvements have also streamlined UHPLC workflows. Modern systems feature intelligent method development tools that optimize parameters such as gradient profiles and column temperatures, reducing manual intervention and improving reproducibility.
3. Multidimensional Chromatography
Multidimensional chromatography (MDC) involves coupling two or more separation techniques to enhance resolving power for highly complex samples. By exploiting different separation mechanisms, MDC overcomes the limitations of one-dimensional methods, particularly in analyzing intricate biological or environmental matrices.
A prominent example is Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography (GC×GC), which combines two GC columns with distinct stationary phases. The first column separates compounds based on volatility, while the second column further resolves them by polarity. GC×GC provides unparalleled peak capacity, making it ideal for petrochemical analysis, fragrance profiling, and metabolomics.
Similarly, Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography (LC×LC) pairs two orthogonal LC separations, such as reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). This approach is widely used in proteomics and lipidomics, where sample complexity demands high-resolution techniques.
Recent advancements in MDC include the development of heart-cutting and stop-flow methods, which improve flexibility in targeted analyses. Heart-cutting allows specific fractions from the first dimension to be transferred to the second dimension, reducing analysis time for known compounds. Stop-flow techniques pause the first-dimension separation to extend the second-dimension analysis, enhancing resolution for critical peaks.
Conclusion
Both gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography are indispensable tools in analytical chemistry, each suited for specific types of compounds and applications. While GC excels in analyzing volatile substances, HPLC provides versatility for a broader range of samples. Advances in technology continue to enhance their precision, speed, and applicability across various industries. Understanding these techniques allows scientists to choose the most appropriate method for their analytical needs.